Tuesday, April 28, 2015

Why Financial Advisers Often Aren’t Needed

                      
Most investors don’t need financial advisers for three basic reasons.
                       
First: Basic investing principles are easy to master. I mention them often.

Secondly: What to buy is simple in the age of index funds. There is no reason to attempt to buy individual securities. I have explained why in much of my past comments and books.
                       
And three: Adviser fees eat too much out of investment earnings. I repeat this constantly. Adviser fees can account for as much as 20% and more of annual investor earnings.
                       
The garden variety of advisers, that is the bulk of them, are not worth the money because their expertise is run-of-the- mill.
                       
On the other hand, investors who have estate and tax questions need legal advisers. That has little to do with portfolio selection. (See the Earl J. Weinreb NewsHole® comments and @BusinessNewshole at Twitter.)

No comments:

Post a Comment