Tuesday, January 31, 2012

ETFs Have Capital Gains?

ETFs are generally tax efficient; most often they have indexed securities with little transactions among their investments. Therefore, at year end they have little taxable charges due to Uncle Sam.

On some occasions they may have to sell assets to adjust their indexes, and taxes result. Mutual funds that are managed, however, buy and sell shares constantly, and are prone to capital gains, especially in rising markets. (See the Earl J Weinreb NewsHole® comments.)

Monday, January 30, 2012

The Dangerous Options Market

Options offer an investor the right but not the obligation to buy or sell a security at a set price.

Options are used for investments becoming more impervious to swings in the markets, Also, to protect shares from under-performing. And to make money when market conditions are extreme.

To invest in options, you must take time to learn fully about them. Know the difference between a call and a put, strike price and all applicable terms.

There is no real quick options course, Take your time learning because of the complex nature of the arcane aspect of this classification of the securities business.

Do not get involved unless you learn about options both academically and in practice. Therefore, run through some fantasy dry-runs with no real funds, just to see how you would have done with real money. Then use your own real capital. (See the Earl J Weinreb NewsHole® comments.)

Sunday, January 29, 2012

Dismal Hedge Fund Activity

Recent years have not been as good for hedge funds as they have been in the past.

This past year has certainly not been as successful as the early 2000s. Some funds did well though not as they did several years ago, during their Golden Age. That’s when they were getting 20% and more return a year.

Many have been lucky to do as well as the S&P 500 Index, and without all the risk that hedge fund investors undertake.

But hope and professional ignorance can be eternal. (See the Earl J Weinreb NewsHole® comments.)

Saturday, January 28, 2012

The Short-Market Investment Strategy?

One market strategy is watching the size of the number of short positions on the NYSE and Nasdaq exchanges.

“Short” shares are borrowed and then sold, hoping the price will fall before the borrowed shares have to be replaced. A larger than normal position can be bullish because it means more buying than the previous selling positions.

Yet, there can be other reasons why traders take such trading stances to reduce risk. At any rate, the strategy doesn’t always work for whatever the underlying facts.(See the Earl J Weinreb NewsHole® comments.)

Friday, January 27, 2012

The Fed’s Flub of the Sub-Prime Meltdown

Federal Reserve minutes disclosed early in 2012 indicate how off the mark the Fed was in gauging the instability of the residential market in 2006 and 2007, even after residential real estate prices began falling.

Outside a few voices, the consensus was that no serious dangers were ahead. A light cyclical downturn at most was the worst they saw.

This proves again there are no regulatory experts in government, just those given the job of being the master of a financial behemoth beyond their ability to comprehend. (See the Earl J Weinreb NewsHole® comments.)

Thursday, January 26, 2012

Adviser Market-Timing Near-Impossibility

To add to the injury done by financial advisers because of their high usage cost in form of fees: they tend to time the market with too much portfolio change.

This is done to show clients they’re actively engaged in servicing the account. The result of repeated research: The chances of "experts" getting out at a high is 10%. The chances of getting back in at a low is 10%. Thus roundtrip success rate is 1%.

The attempt at expert timing is futile and ridiculous. ( See the Earl J Weinreb NewsHole® comments.)

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

How Much Can You Eat Up Annually From Your Retirement Funds?

How much can you take from your nest-egg after retirement and have enough for the rest of your life?

The idea so many advisers suggest is that you can eat into a retirement fund to the extent of 4% a year, once you retire. But that is very arbitrary, meaningless and pointless.

The cost of living never remains constant while huge inflationary pressures are on the horizon. Health and other issues are never predictable.

Living conditions and personal needs vary with time and cannot be structured by a set formula. Unforeseen emergencies are bound to affect such percentage estimates and make them impractical. ( See the Earl J Weinreb NewsHole® comments.)